Optic neuropathy secondary to perhexiline and amiodarone
- 1 South Australian Institute of Ophthalmology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- 2 Discipline of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Correspondence to Dr Yiran Tan; ian.tan1100@gmail.com
Abstract
Bilateral optic disc swelling is an important clinical sign for potentially life-threatening and sight-threatening conditions, with the most common being raised intracranial pressure and pseudopapillitis. Perhexiline-related and amiodarone-related optic disc swellings are diagnoses of exclusion. This report describes the diagnosis of a man with perhexiline-induced and amiodarone-induced optic neuropathy after extensive investigation consisting of full ophthalmic examination, biochemical screen, temporal artery biopsy, CT, MRI, positron emission tomography and lumbar puncture. There was partial to complete resolution of optic neuropathy following cessation of the causative medication. We postulate that the underlying mechanism of perhexiline toxicity could be mitochondrial dysfunction related. Our case demonstrates that patients treated with perhexiline and amiodarone should be monitored closely for ocular side effects.
Background
Perhexiline maleate is an antianginal agent used for the management of refractory angina pectoris. The use of perhexiline maleate is now less common due to its high rate of toxicity, including neuropathic, hepatic and ocular side effects.1 Amiodarone was also originally developed as an antianginal drug but is now more commonly prescribed for its antiarrhythmic properties. It has been associated with the development of vortex keratopathy, anterior subcapsular cataract, maculopathy and visual loss secondary to optic neuropathy (ON).2
We report a case of bilateral optic disc swelling secondary to perhexiline and amiodarone, which improved following cessation of the causative agent. Comprehensive work-up was essential to validate the diagnosis of perhexiline-induced ON after excluding other potentially life-threatening and sight-threatening causes.
Case presentation
A 71-year-old man presented to the ophthalmologist with an incidental finding of bilateral optic disc swelling that was noticed by his optometrist. He was asymptomatic on presentation and has a previous medical history significant for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and ischaemic heart disease, for which he was treated with perhexiline maleate at 150 mg per day for the past 2 years.
On assessment, best-corrected visual acuities were 6/9 in the right and 6/7.5 in the left. There was no relative afferent pupillary defect and Ishihara colour plate testing was normal. Visual fields testing (HVF30-2) was normal in the right eye and showed non-specific mild defects in the left eye. Cranial nerves examination was unremarkable. Fundus examination showed bilateral hyperemic optic disc swelling that is worse in the left eye (figure 1A,B). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the optic discs showed marked swelling of the retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL; figure 2). A subsequent fundus fluorescein angiography revealed hyperfluorescence at the optic discs (figure 1C,D).
Fundus photographs and fluorescein angiogram of the right and left eye showing progression of optic disc swelling at various stages of presentation. There was left-worse-than-right optic disc swelling at presentation while patient was on perhexiline (A and B) with increased hyperfluoresence on fluorescein angiogram at the optic discs (C and D). Optic disc swelling has largely resolved at 6 months’ follow-up after cessation of amiodarone (E and F).
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) and Humphrey visual field (HVF) 30–2 test. OCT RNFL thickness demonstrating progression and in relation to perhexiline-induced and amiodarone-induced optic disc swelling (A). HVF 30–2 showing constricting field defect in the left eye after commencing amiodarone (B). OS, oculus sinister (left); OD, oculus dexter (right).
Investigations
CT and MRI of the brain and orbits were unremarkable. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination showed mildly elevated protein with opening pressure of 24.5 cm CSF, normal biochemistry and negative infective screen. Blood work showed a mildly elevated C reactive protein (35 mg/L) and raised erythrocyte sedimentation rate (60 mm/hour). Inflammatory screenings, including angiotensin-converting enzyme, antinuclear antibodies, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody, rheumatoid factor and double-stranded DNA antibodies, were all normal. In view of raised inflammatory markers, a biopsy of the patient’s right temporal artery was performed and showed normal histology. Infective screen, including tests for syphilis and tuberculosis, was also negative. Positron emission tomography (PET) scan was done that showed an incidental intestinal mass that was resected and noted to be a low-grade adenomatous polyp. Perhexiline levels were not elevated (0.37 mg/L) and the patient had no hepatic or renal dysfunction. Investigations were guided by specialist teams from neurology, rheumatology and internal medicine.
Differential diagnosis
Potential life-threatening and sight-threatening causes of bilateral optic disc swelling were considered, including raised intracranial pressure (ICP), pseudopapillitis, autoimmune or connective tissue disease, vasculitis and malignancy. All differential diagnoses were appropriately excluded following an extensive work-up consisting of biochemical screening, relevant imaging (CT, MRI, PET scans), temporal artery biopsy and lumbar puncture. The elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was attributed to a concurrent upper respiratory tract infection with pericarditis, which was later discovered and required inpatient treatment. Non-arteritic anterior ischaemic ON (NAION) was also considered but deemed less likely due to duration of clinical signs greater than 3 months and eventual complete resolution. In the absence of an identifiable aetiology, perhexiline-induced ON was suspected.
Treatment
Perhexiline was ceased 1 month following initial presentation. A short 3-week tapering course of oral prednisolone was trialled with no significant response.
Outcome and follow-up
The patient’s visual acuity, optic nerve function and optic disc swelling remained clinically unchanged in the initial 8 weeks following presentation. One month following cessation of perhexiline, disc swelling was persistent on fundus examination, but subclinical improvement was first noted on OCT RNFL (figure 2). At 9 months’ follow-up and 8 months following cessation of perhexiline, the disc swelling had completely resolved (figure 2).
At 23 months’ follow-up, the patient had newfound bilateral vortex keratopathy and recurrence of bilateral optic disc swelling. He had remained clinically asymptomatic and reported to having started amiodarone (200 mg per day) for atrial fibrillation 6 months prior. Best-corrected visual acuities were 6/7.5 bilaterally. Optic nerve function tests and OCT showed significant RFNL thickening bilaterally (figure 2A). HVF30-2 showed constricting field defects in both eyes, with left worse than right (figure 2B).
In view of a similar clinical picture to the patient’s first presentation, amiodarone-induced ON was inferred. Amiodarone was discontinued in discussion with the patient’s cardiologist. At follow-up 6 months after cessation of amiodarone, there was partial improvement in his disc swelling (figure 1E,F; and figure 2A) and both his vision and optic nerve function remained stable.
Discussion
ON secondary to perhexiline and amiodarone typically presents with progressive visual obscuration or visual loss. For perhexiline-induced ON, ocular findings are always present in association with other neurological or gastrointestinal symptoms.1 To our best knowledge, this is the first case of bilateral optic disc swelling secondary to both perhexiline and amiodarone where the patient was clinically asymptomatic throughout his presentation. The diagnosis of drug-induced ON was reached from a thorough work-up consisting of imaging and CSF examination. The lumbar CSF opening pressure of 24.5 cm CSF was within the upper limits of the 95% reference range.3 For this reason, we have used the term ‘disc swelling’ as opposed to ‘papilledema’.
Pseudotumor cerebri is a side effect that is associated with both perhexiline and amiodarone therapy. Early reports described an acute increase in ICP for patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia treated with intravenous amiodarone.4 ICP returned to baseline within 8 min following cessation of amiodarone infusion. Subsequent case reports have highlighted the onset of headache and blurred vision after initiation of amiodarone therapy and eventual resolution of symptoms after the drug is discontinued.5–7 Pseudotumor cerebri attributed to perhexiline are mostly speculative, with only one case supported by an elevated CSF opening pressure on lumbar puncture.1 8 The exact mechanism for perhexiline and amiodarone related increase in ICP remains unknown. The amphiphilic properties of both drugs have been hypothesised to be important in the underlying pathogenesis.6 Patients with suspected pseudotumor cerebri secondary to amiodarone and perhexiline exhibit a range of symptoms on presentation, including blurred vision, headache, nausea, tinnitus and unsteady gait.1 5–8 Our patient had borderline raised ICP but was completely asymptomatic on presentation and throughout the duration of follow-up. In addition, our patient did not have risk factors for pseudotumor cerebri, was never medically treated with acetazolamide and had a significant improvement in optic disc swelling following cessation of perhexiline and amiodarone. Therefore, while pseudotumor cerebri cannot be completely excluded, the diagnosis is more in keeping with drug-induced ON, where cessation of causative agents may have prevented progression towards impairment of visual function.
The pathogenesis of perhexiline-induced ON is not well documented. Perhexiline exhibits polymorphic metabolism via the CYP2D6 enzyme. It has been suggested that the side effects of perhexiline are more pronounced in patients with impaired metabolism due to CYP2D6 mutations.9 We did not conduct CYP2D6 genetic testing in our patient as there was no intention to recommence perhexiline. A common observation is that amiodarone and perhexiline are both amphiphilic drugs that can result in phospholipidosis, a phenomenon also seen in inherited metabolic disorders, such as Fabry’s disease. The cytoplasmic lipid inclusions in the optic nerve may then exert a mechanical effect that leads to decrease is similar axoplasmic flow and results in optic disc swelling.10 11 Moreover, amiodarone and perhexiline also exert inhibitory effects on the respiratory chains I and II in the mitochondria, leading to mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress.12 13 ON can result from mitochondrial diseases, but usually manifested in the form of optic atrophy or optic disc pseudo-oedema (swelling of the nerve fibre layer surrounding the disc).14 Perhexiline-induced optic disc changes typically improve 6 weeks after withdrawal of the drug.1 On the other hand, amiodarone-induced optic disc swelling tends to persist up to 100 days due to its prolonged half-life.2
Learning points
-
Patients treated with perhexiline and amiodarone should be monitored closely for ocular side effects.
-
Diagnosis of perhexiline-induced and amiodarone-induced optic neuropathy should involve comprehensive work-up to exclude other common causes of optic disc swelling.
-
Management for perhexiline-induced and amiodarone-induced optic neuropathy is an entail cessation of causative medication as tolerated.
-
We postulate that the underlying mechanism of perhexiline toxicity could be mitochondrial dysfunction related.
Footnotes
-
Contributors YT was responsible for obtaining patient consent, acquisition of clinical information, interpretation of data and writing the manuscript. PS was responsible for interpretation of data and guiding construction of manuscript. SS was responsible for conception and design of case report and guiding construction of manuscript.
-
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
-
Competing interests None declared.
-
Patient consent for publication Obtained.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
- © BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
References
Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer